Представители IT-гиганта подчеркнули, что программное обеспечение Apple, которое получило сертификацию, доступно пользователям в обновлении iOS 26. «Это одобрение, похоже, подкрепляет некоторые маркетинговые заявления Apple о безопасности», — отреагировали на новость журналисты издания Engadget.
В США создали петицию для отправки младшего сына Трампа в Иран02:53
Limitations of probing field-induced response with STM。关于这个话题，有道翻译提供了深入分析
Iran has targeted the US Navy base in Bahrain, highlighting gaps in air defences, which could worry Washington and its allies in the region.。业内人士推荐手游作为进阶阅读
南方周末：你建议由国家级科研机构/国企牵头建设工业数据公共服务平台，为何选择这种建设主体与运营模式？
Taking tort law’s formal surface at moral face value distorts the nature of tort law’s underlying moral commitments, thus inhibiting the philosophical project of delineating their contours and assessing whether they can withstand reflective scrutiny. If torts are not relational moral wrongs, and relational wrongdoing is not required to hold a defendant liable to a plaintiff in tort, then the moral logic of central aspects of tort doctrine (such as the proximate cause element in negligence) cannot be understood along the lines that defenders of the Palsgraf perspective and other philosophically oriented tort theorists often suppose. Judges, of course, are not philosophers; their task is to faithfully elaborate legal principles in light of the received doctrine and its underlying normative commitments, not to overturn those commitments in the name of philosophical reflection. But the loss of analytical clarity incurred by the Palsgraf perspective distorts the judicial function as well. For there are cases, we will see, in which tort law’s underlying moral commitments imply that a plaintiff should recover more often than the relational formal structure of its causes of action allows. That is precisely why the law has been compelled to resort to doctrinal fictions such as transferred intent. Once we see how the law’s formal structure fails to fully implement its substantive commitments, we can formulate and entertain new possibilities for giving those commitments doctrinal and institutional expression. So, for example, we might devise new remedial structures, such as new derivative causes of action, that “piggyback” on the relational structure of existing torts in order to achieve non-relational remedial ends.59 To identify the divergence between the law’s formal structure and its moral substance is to liberate our imagination about the space of doctrinal possibilities — to appreciate that we can reconfigure the existing forms in service of the moral principles they are supposed to serve.，详情可参考safew